The Children’s, Schools & Families Select Committee’s report 2009 on the National Curriculum states:
“The Department’s argument for Academies’ curriculum freedoms is that these schools have a particularly disadvantaged pupil intake and therefore may need to spend more time on literacy and numeracy or find new ways to engage pupils in their learning. The Department expects that as Academies drive up performance they will offer the full National Curriculum to the large majority of their pupils. In the meantime, however, it deems Academies’ curriculum freedoms to be essential if these schools are to raise standards”.
“Given that the Department sees Academies’ curriculum freedoms as a key factor in their ability to raise standards, and that the Minister is so confident that Academies’ curriculum freedoms have not damaged these pupils’ access to a rounded curriculum, it is not clear why the Department restricts these freedoms to Academies. We recommend that the freedoms that Academies enjoy in relation to the National Curriculum be immediately extended to all maintained schools”.
( Full Report: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmchilsch/344/34408.htm#a14 )
Estelle Morris writes in The Guardian Today:
“The national curriculum provides an entitlement to all children to be taught a range of subjects. It stops schools giving up on children who find it difficult to learn or who are difficult to teach. Yet there is no doubt that for some young people the national curriculum is too rigid and its restrictions can stifle teachers’ creativity. Getting the balance right between the entitlement guaranteed by a national curriculum and the flexibility sometimes called for isn’t easy.
So what is the government’s response? Schools can have extra flexibility, but only if they are an academy or free school.
On what possible basis can the answers to these key questions about the curriculum be determined by the legal category of the school and not the needs of the children in them? Have children in non-academy schools less need for flexibility or are their teachers less likely to use such freedoms responsibly”?
Read more here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/jan/23/national-curriculum-review?fb=native&CMP=FBCNETTXT9038
Do you have a view? Please comment!
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.